THE TAX LOOP HOLE FOR THE AVERAGE AMERICAN

Submitted by taxman on July 17, 2006 - 3:16pm.
The Federal and Alabama governments once taxed all gains on the sale of a primary residence. When that was true, they deferred the taxes when the total proceeds from the sale of a home was rolled into the purchase of a new home within 24 months from the date of the sale. The burden of proof that this requirement was met rested with the taxpayer. As of May 6, 1997 you may exclude up to $250,000 of gain on a primary residence provided that you live in the house at least 2 of the previous 5 years. That applies to each person. So, a married couple can exclude up to $500,000 if they meet the primary residence test. This change in tax code eliminates the old deferral method of tax savings. Your tax basis in your current home is not changed by the new law. It is widely known that many people have a much lower tax basis in their residence than what it is currently worth. This tax loop hole can be used every two years. This is the most widely misunderstood tax break I know of. It could be utilized a number of ways to put cash in your bank account.

I am going to share with you several ways that I have personally witnessed people making big profits from this tax break. Example one is a rental property. The client owned the property for approximately 4 years and converted the property to rental property. They had rolled a gain into the property of approximately $12,000 and had a tax basis of $48,000. They rented the property for approximately six years and depreciated the house as required by the IRS. They completely renovated the house and then moved into the house for two years. They sold the house for approximately $110,000. Since they moved into the house for a 2 year period before they sold, the entire gain was tax free because it was less than the $500,000 thresh hold. Depreciation was about $1,750 so the taxpayer basis was $46,250. Total profit on the deal was $63,750. The great news was that is was 100% TAX FREE! Folks, that is true wealth building. Finally, you can do this ever two years. It just doesn't get better that this. It is widely accepted that to build wealth one has to get outside of the tax system. Here is one way to do it legally!

For my second example I want to talk about a project house. The client purchased the house in bad need of renovation. He purchased the house for $24,000. He fixed the house up enough to make it suitable to move in and live. While living in the home he continued to repair and enhance the home. After living in the home for 28 months he put it up for sale and sold it within two weeks for $98,000. It is called sweat equity but let's take a look at what he accomplished. He spent $11,000 in repair cost and paid $24,000 for the house. Total Sales price of $98,000 - $35,000 equals a profit of $63,000. Since the gain was less than $250,000, and he met the primary residence requirement, this too was 100% TAX FREE! He got paid $63,000 for living in the house and repairing it.

My final example was a young couple that did not have young children. They were building their first home and decided that they would do some of the work as they built. He was a carpenter so he was quite capable of doing much of the work and she liked to paint and do the little fixing up kind of stuff. Between framing, finish carpentry and painting they saved almost $30,000 on the build. They had a child shortly after moving in the house and in just under three years they were expecting another child. Well the house was too small so they would have to move up to a larger house. They sold their house for a gain of just over $60,000. The good news is that is was their primary home for more than 24 months and was completely tax free.

These are real examples of scenarios that truly happened. A business acquaintance and I have come up with a number of ways that this tax loop hole can be used. The bottom line is that this is one of the truly great wealth building opportunities for the average wage earner. You can make it work for you too. If you have questions about your taxes contact us.

( categories: tax code )

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by Sandra Castaneda on May 18, 2007 - 1:32pm.

Last month my husband and I moved into a house we have been working on for 2 years and the renovations are not complete. I was disappointed to find out I could not deduct the materials or labor I had paid out on the house. I was told I could deduct sales tax on materials but after spending $30,000.00 dollars the sales tax wasn't enough to meet the minimum to deduct. We are still spending and working and living in an unfinished house. Do you have any ideas that would benefit us next year at tax time.

Submitted by taxman on August 30, 2007 - 9:47am.

Let me first apologize for not answering you sooner. I discovered a problem with notification on my end and I didn't know you had posted. The biggest opportunity for you to benefit from the expenditures relate to tax credits for energy saving improvements done to the home. Here is a link that goes into detail about the available credits. Also, the sales tax on the home improvement materials are only part of the total sales tax deduction. Did you use the formula to caluclate the total available deduction?
Barry S. Thompson, CPA

Submitted by taxman on September 18, 2006 - 1:37pm.

Q: My understanding is that I have to reinvest the profit from the sale of my home in a new home in order to avoid capital gains tax. Is this true?

A: This was true within cetain parameters under the old law. However, as of May 7, 1997 you can sell a primary personal residence every two years and exclude up to $250,000 of gain per owner. A husband and wife can exclude from income $500,000 in capital gain from the sale of a primary personal residence. If the gain is less than $500,000 you are not even required to include the sale on your return. However, if the closing attorney sends a 1099 concerning the sale we will include the sale and show no gain using schedule D in order to avoid confusion.

Submitted by taxman on September 18, 2006 - 10:49am.

Q:  My parents own several rental properties and have considered doing just as you suggest.  Converting a rental property to personal use by moving into the house and then selling the house after it has served as their primary residence for 2 years.  They have been advised that they will need to recapture the depreciation taken on the property in the year that they convert the property.  Is this true and if so doesn't it ruin your strategy as presented?

A:  First and foremost, based on the facts you submitted, your parents have received bad advice.  They should calculate MACRS depreciation as though there was a disposition in the year they convert the property.  It is not necessary to recapture depreciation in the year of conversion.  (This loophole had been closed now)  If the property is converted to a personal residence for 2 years, then the depreciation taken after May 6, 1997 could not be excluded from income when the property is sold.  However, any remaining basis in that property would be excludable income.  Depreciation taken prior to May 7, 1997 would simply be an adjustment to basis and the exclusion for sale of a personal residence would then be applied.

Two publications that address related issues are publication 523 " " and publication 544 "Sale and Other Disposition of Assets"